Commonwealth v. Cavanaugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The removal of the articles may or may not indicate felonious intent; this depends upon whether appellant intended to permanently deprive the owners of their property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth ex rel. Kerekes v. Maroney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-11-15· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Roundtree
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-10-09· cited 80×
• Commonwealth v. Slavik
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Metz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-04-18· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 21×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Whitling v. Russell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-06-15· cited 7×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Hoch v. Banmiller
  Franklin County Court of Common Pleas· 1957-08-10· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth ex rel. Popovich v. Claudy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-03-24· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Meinhart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-07-14· cited 25×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Dion v. Tees
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-11-16· cited 25×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Yeschenko v. Keenan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 17×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Smilley v. Claudy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-01-20· cited 15×
• Hilliard Lumber Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-03-16· cited 14×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. La Tempa v. Burke
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-07-13· cited 7×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Robinson v. Maroney
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-07-13· cited 5×