Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cavanaugh

Citations

  • 420 A.2d 674
  • 278 Pa. Super. 542
  • 1980 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2660

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although the defendant possessed an intent to inflict serious bodily injury, such injury did not exist where the defendant struck the victim’s head with a tire iron, causing lacerations requiring nine stitches
  • finding that a tire iron is not an instrument of crime in an assault case
  • Court affirmed separate convictions for aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and terroristic threats arising out of single attack on victim with tire iron; held, however, that separate sentence for simple assault merged
  • Court affirmed separate convictions for aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and terroristic threats arising out of single attack on victim with tire iron; held, however, that separate sentence for simple assault merged
  • defendant’s action in striking victim on the head with a tire iron sufficient to support REAP conviction
  • a tire iron is not an instrument of crime in an assault case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Hester, Cavanaugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.