Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/6/2004
Commonwealth v. Castro
Citations
- 856 A.2d 178
- 2004 Pa. Super. 308
- 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that Commonwealth’s proffer of eyewitness testimony of the arresting officer to the appellant’s participation in a drug transaction was sufficient evidence to show a violation of probation
- “[the defendant] was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper”
- “Appellant was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper[.]”
- “Appellant was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Musmanno, Montemuro, Beck
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. ColonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-24· cited 398×
- Com. v. Simmons, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-08-18· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. A.R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-15· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. A.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 18×
- Com. v. Parson, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-07-28· cited 5×
- Com. v. ARSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-01-15
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Rosario, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-05-16
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 4,277×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-29· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. WareSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-07-09· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. HolderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-08-22· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. RoysterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-12· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. SpinozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. HomokiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-02-09· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. DonatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.