Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Castro

Citations

  • 856 A.2d 178
  • 2004 Pa. Super. 308
  • 2004 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Commonwealth’s proffer of eyewitness testimony of the arresting officer to the appellant’s participation in a drug transaction was sufficient evidence to show a violation of probation
  • “[the defendant] was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper”
  • “Appellant was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper[.]”
  • “Appellant was found in violation of his parole, which he was serving at the time of his arrest, and in anticipatory violation of his probation, which had not yet begun to run. Such a finding is proper[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musmanno, Montemuro, Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.