Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Castillo

Citations

  • 66 Mass. App. Ct. 34
  • 845 N.E.2d 403
  • 2006 Mass. App. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that by stipulating to evidence, a defendant surrenders a number of rights “including the right to confrontation [and] the right to cross-examine witnesses”
  • observing that by stipulating to evidence, defendant surrenders number of rights \including the right to confrontation [and] the right to cross-examine witnesses\
  • nothing in record suggested that defendant was aware of significance of trial based on stipulated evidence
  • trial on stipulated facts not constitutionally capable of supporting conviction absent colloquy regarding constitutional rights waived
  • where defendant stipulated to material facts conclusive of guilt in case tried to judge, stipulation was tantamount to guilty plea, and failure of judge to engage defendant in plea colloquy required reversal of convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.