Commonwealth v. Castillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• damage caused by Department’s improper storage of chemicals is not the direct or unavoidable consequence of the storage itself and so is negligence and not de facto taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of Westminster
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-04-12· cited 263×
• In re Ramsey
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-20· cited 30×
• Fulmer v. White Oak Borough
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-19· cited 18×
• Condemnation of 2719, 2721 and 2711
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-08-01· cited 16×
• Espy v. Butler Area Sewer Authority
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-12-08· cited 12×
• In Re: Condemnation by PennDOT, of Right-of-Way for SR 1032, Section B02, in the Borough of Rochester: Cronimet Corp. v. PennDOT
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-05-05· cited 8×
• Lehan v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-12-16· cited 4×
• Condemnation by Springettsbury Township Sewer Authority
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-16· cited 3×
• Bacon v. Commonwealth
  Northumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 1975-01-13

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ewalt v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-06-27· cited 37×
• Rawls v. Central Bucks Joint School Building Authority
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-01· cited 30×