Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/28/1989
Commonwealth v. Cassidy
Citations
- 568 A.2d 693
- 390 Pa. Super. 359
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3768
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- second prong of Cohen test met as order disqualifying defendant's counsel implicates sixth amendment right of United States Constitution
- second prong of Cohen test met as order disqualifying defendant’s counsel implicates sixth amendment right of United States Constitution
- in criminal case order disqualifying counsel is immediately appealable by criminal defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Rowley, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. HlatkySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-25· cited 48×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-06· cited 33×
- Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-27· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Youngblood v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2002-11-27· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. $9,847.00 U.S. CurrencyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-02-01· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. CoffeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-21· cited 4×
- Gamble v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-15· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-09· cited 2×
- Commonwealth v. HeaneyLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 2015-02-23
- Cluck v. Jesus Is Lord Ministries International Inc.Adams County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-07-16
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- United States v. GarciaFifth Circuit· 1975-08-07· cited 327×
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-18· cited 308×
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 288×
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-20· cited 240×
- Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-03-16· cited 145×
- United States v. Patrick J. Cunningham and John J. SweeneySecond Circuit· 1982-02-18· cited 137×
- United States v. Joseph Vincent Agosto, United States of America v. Deil Otto Gustafson, United States of America v. Joan Lorrain NorrisEighth Circuit· 1982-04-09· cited 111×
- United States v. Russell HobsonEleventh Circuit· 1982-03-24· cited 97×
- United States v. William Sheiner and Victor Piacentile, A/K/A Victor PeaseSecond Circuit· 1969-04-04· cited 78×
- United States v. Priscilla Dominguez LauraThird Circuit· 1979-10-15· cited 77×
- Griffith v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court· 1969-10-13· cited 76×
- United States v. Francis Curcio and Gus CurcioSecond Circuit· 1982-11-16· cited 72×
- United States v. Louis C. OstrerSecond Circuit· 1979-04-23· cited 60×
- United States v. Robert Flanagan, James Keweshan, Sidney Landis and Thomas McNameeThird Circuit· 1982-06-02· cited 60×
- United States v. Leonard W. WisniewskiSecond Circuit· 1973-04-03· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.