Skip to main content
· 10/6/1992

Commonwealth v. Carver

Citations

  • 600 N.E.2d 588
  • 33 Mass. App. Ct. 378
  • 1992 Mass. App. LEXIS 825

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that \[the judge] acted within his discretion\ in excluding \evidence that [Carver] had been acquitted of making threats to burn ... Project Rap\
  • where defendant, upon counsel’s advice, chose “all or nothing” strategy and did not request manslaughter charge, no error in omission
  • judge “entitled to use his knowledge and evaluation of the evidence at trial in reaching a decision” on criminal defendant’s motion for new trial
  • judge \entitled to use his knowledge and evaluation of the evidence at trial in reaching a decision\ on motion for new trial
  • judge can increase severity of sentence if it appears justice may not have been done
  • a motion judge may rule on issues raised by a new trial motion without a hearing if no new substantial issue is raised by the motions or affidavits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kass, Porada, Laurence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.