Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carter

Citations

  • 122 A.3d 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we will regard as done that which ought to have been done and treating a filing as timely
  • stating that, the direct appeal period does not begin to run when the clerk of courts fails to issue notice of the adjudication of a post-sentence motion
  • directing that the appeal period does not run until the clerk of court mails or delivers copies of the order to the parties as shown on the docket
  • stating that, the “appeal period only begins running on the date the [clerk of courts] mails or delivers copies of the orders to the parties” (original quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that, the “appeal period only begins running on the date the [clerk of courts] mails or delivers copies of the orders to the parties” (original quotation marks omitted)
  • stating that “[w]e will regard as done that which ought to have been done”; treating appeal timely despite clerk of courts’ failure to inscribe date of service on docket

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Stabile, Jenkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.