Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carter

Citations

  • 403 N.E.2d 1191
  • 9 Mass. App. Ct. 680
  • 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • examining pediatrician may give opinion relating to the ability of a retarded child to differentiate between reality and fantasy but not concerning whether the child was telling the truth about an alleged sexual assault
  • examining pediatrician may give opinion relating to the ability of a retarded child to differentiate between reality and fantasy but not concerning whether the child was telling the truth about an alleged sexual assault
  • Trial court erred in failing to strike doctor’s testimony that child was telling the truth.
  • Trial court erred in failing to strike doctor's testimony that child was telling the truth.
  • doctor’s opinion that mildly retarded child was telling the truth held objectionable
  • doctor's opinion that mildly retarded child was telling the truth held objectionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale, Grant, Nolan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.