Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carter

Citations

  • 656 A.2d 463
  • 540 Pa. 135
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a defendant must be advised that sentences can be run consecutively and no prejudice occurs when the trial court’s sentence does not exceed the defendant’s expectations of imprisonment
  • Carter’s plea knowing and voluntary were, even though he was not told sentences could run consecutively, he was informed of maximum sentence for each count and his sentence was less than the maximum
  • where defendant’s aggregate penalty did not exceed the maximum single-count sentence of which he was aware when he pled nolo contendere, -4- J-S03035-15 he was not prejudiced by the lack of accurate advice regarding his potential maximum sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, C.J., and Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille and Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.