Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carroll

Citations

  • 507 A.2d 819
  • 510 Pa. 299
  • 1986 Pa. LEXIS 758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant constructively possessed a controlled substance where officers found drugs and paraphernalia hidden throughout husband and wife’s shared motel room
  • “[J]oint control will not prevent a finding of constructive possession in one of the individuals . . . .”
  • evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that a husband had constructive possession of drugs found in woman’s pants in a hotel room he rented with his family
  • “Constructive possession by its nature is not amenable to ‘bright line’ tests.”
  • “Constructive possession by its nature is not amenable to ‘bright line’ tests.”
  • defendant, his wife and his step-daughter were staying in a hotel room; defendant constructively possessed drugs found in the pocket of a pair of his wife’s pants that were lying on the floor as well as drug paraphernalia located throughout hotel room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.