Commonwealth v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• contempt improper where “defendants were neither told of the significance of being recognized as a witness nor warned of the consequences of failure to appear”
• “As a preliminary matter, the trial judge must warn individuals that they are in danger of being charged with contempt of court before contempt rules may be invoked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Byrnes
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-08-08· cited 18×
• Misquez v. Baca
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-08-08· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Diamond
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-01-07· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Malley
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-06-10· cited 3×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Corsetti
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-07-30· cited 54×
• Sussman v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-03-22· cited 33×
• In the Matter of David Lamson
  First Circuit· 1972-10-11· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Segal
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-11-09· cited 11×