Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/28/1977
Commonwealth v. Carpenter
Citations
- 372 A.2d 806
- 472 Pa. 510
- 1977 Pa. LEXIS 653
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting lay witness opinion regarding voice recognition by acquaintance who identified speaker over telephone
- telephone identification by an acquaintance who then passed the receiver to law enforcement was admissible lay witness evidence
- police officer can identify voice after hearing voice several times over the telephone and talking to defendant once in person
- identity of calling party is generally done by testimony as to witness’s recognition of calling party’s voice
- Identification by acquaintance who then passed receiver to officer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-07· cited 140×
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-03· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-05-01· cited 60×
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-06· cited 47×
- Commonwealth v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-17· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-03-23· cited 31×
- Commonwealth v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-05· cited 23×
- Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-04· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. HallowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-08· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. RomanskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-10-31· cited 7×
- In Re: Order Approving the Amendment of Pa Rules of Evidence 901(a), 902(4), 902(6) & 902(12)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-04
- In Re: Order Approving the Amendment of Pa Rule of Evidence 901Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-20
- Com. v. Williams, LSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-05-25
- Commonwealth v. RamosLehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2008-02-19
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 732×
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-01-29· cited 388×
- Commonwealth v. StoltzfusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-13· cited 382×
- Commonwealth v. GaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-07-06· cited 75×
- United States v. HarrisThird Circuit· 1974-05-30· cited 61×
- Commonwealth v. JenningsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-20· cited 37×
- Burton v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-11-13· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. MoehringSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-12-29· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-01-09· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. DeMarcoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-30· cited 12×
- Reach v. National Bedding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1923-02-19· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. De RohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-10-12· cited 10×
- Kobierowski v. Commonwealth Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-05-21· cited 7×
- Limestone Products & Supply Co. v. Tom Brown, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-06-13· cited 6×
- Midland Credit Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.