Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Carey

Citations

  • 439 A.2d 151
  • 293 Pa. Super. 359
  • 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an accomplice is one who “knowingly and voluntarily cooperates with or aids another in the commission of a crime”
  • even though original act of solicitation occurred in Philadelphia County, ultimate act was to be performed in Delaware County and that county should have jurisdiction to try defendant
  • It's logical that even though the original solicitation may have taken p]a_ce in Philadelphia County, the ultimate act was to be performed in Delaware County and that county should have jurisdiction to try the defendant.
  • “It's logical that even though the original solicitation may have taken place in Philadelphia County, the ultimate act was to be performed in Delaware County and that county should have jurisdiction to try the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Stranahan, Sugerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.