Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/1/1984
Commonwealth v. Capitolo
Citations
- 471 A.2d 462
- 324 Pa. Super. 61
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an accused has a fundamental right to submit to the jury whatever defenses are legally available to him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cercone, Spaeth, Hester, Brosky, Wieand, Beck, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-24· cited 89×
- Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-03· cited 34×
- Andrews v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-11-13· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. BerriganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-27· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-02-20· cited 10×
- In Re Adoption of KindgrenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-14· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-01· cited 6×
- Samuel v. KindgrenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-14· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1989-04-03
- Commonwealth v. MitaPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1986-10-30
- Commonwealth v. SpayPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1986-11-13
- Commonwealth v. SherryFayette County Court· 1986-05-07
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court· 1967-02-27· cited 4,450×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 2,636×
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 1,897×
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,459×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,382×
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court· 1971-06-14· cited 945×
- Farmer v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 25Supreme Court· 1977-03-07· cited 743×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 689×
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 276×
- Penn Dairies, Inc. v. Milk Control Comm'n of Pa.Supreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 203×
- Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court· 1852-05-12· cited 173×
- United States v. MoylanFourth Circuit· 1969-10-15· cited 142×
- Northern States Power Company v. The State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyEighth Circuit· 1971-09-07· cited 110×
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-04· cited 94×
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-11-22· cited 90×
- United States v. John William Simpson, AKA Brother John SimpsonNinth Circuit· 1972-05-04· cited 88×
- Commonwealth v. ExlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1914-01-05· cited 88×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.