Skip to main content
· 5/6/1991

Commonwealth v. Cannady

Citations

  • 590 A.2d 356
  • 404 Pa. Super. 215
  • 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an appellant may not rely on objection lodged by co-defendant to preserve claim for appeal, even if objection was ^identical to appellate claim now raised
  • where the defendant did not object, and he did not join in his co-defendant’s objection, the issue was waived as to the defendant for purposes of appeal
  • “[A] person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act.”
  • “[A] person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wieand, Montemuro, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.