· 5/6/1991
Commonwealth v. Cannady
Citations
- 590 A.2d 356
- 404 Pa. Super. 215
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1187
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding an appellant may not rely on objection lodged by co-defendant to preserve claim for appeal, even if objection was ^identical to appellate claim now raised
- where the defendant did not object, and he did not join in his co-defendant’s objection, the issue was waived as to the defendant for purposes of appeal
- “[A] person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act.”
- “[A] person is presumed to intend the natural consequences of his act.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Montemuro, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.