Commonwealth v. Camps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[I]t is well settled that the [PBPP] has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years[.]”
• holding that “It is well settled that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years.”
• holding that “[I]t is well settled that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years [.]”
• stating that “the Commonwealth Court maintains exclusive jurisdiction over appeals from administrative parole orders” (citation omitted)
• ‘[A] review of Appellant’s PCRA petition…reveals that he failed to raise the above claims in his petition. As such these claims are waived.’
• “[A] review of Appellant’s PCRA petition … reveals that he failed to raise the above claims in his petition. As such, these claims are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).