Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Callahan

Citations

  • 419 Mass. 306
  • 644 N.E.2d 629
  • 1995 Mass. LEXIS 6

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering a rule 30[a] motion brought to challenge a final sentence imposed by the Appellate Division
  • “This sixty-day time period established in the rule is absolute and may not be extended”
  • Appellate Division not appellate court within meaning of Mass. R. Crim. P. 29 [a], 378 Mass. 899 [1979]
  • the question whether the Appellate Division proceeding denied the defendant his right of due process was properly before the Supreme Judicial Court after the trial judge had denied a rule 30 motion
  • sixty-day time limit in rule 29 is \absolute and may not be extended\
  • Appellate Division has no authority over judgment of conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.