Commonwealth v. Caldwell's

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the legal standards for unfair competition and trademark infringement under the Lanham Act are essentially the same
• “[T]he [c]ourt cannot adopt [the plaintiff]’s conclusory assertion that the undisputed evidence demonstrates [the] defendant’s improper intent to capitalize on [the plaintiff]’s name and reputation. Therefore, this factor does not favor a finding of a likelihood of confusion.”
• “To be famous in the context of a trademark dilution claim, the mark must have a degree of distinctiveness and strength beyond that needed to serve as a trademark; it must be truly prominent and renowned.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).