Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/1/2006

Commonwealth v. Calderon

Citations

65 Mass. App. Ct. 590
842 N.E.2d 986
2006 Mass. App. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that examining doctor’s “statement that the victim’s normal examination was ‘consistent with her disclosures’ . . . should not have been admitted”
concluding that under the facts present there, “the defendant should have known the substance of the [examining] doctor’s testimony in advance”
improper for social worker to testify about steps department took to \seek custody of the victim\
permissible for witness to provide \background information about the social worker's duties and how she became involved in the case\
under former fresh complaint doctrine no error where testimony \included background information about the social worker's duties and how she became involved in the case\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.