Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cain

Citations

  • 637 A.2d 656
  • 432 Pa. Super. 47
  • 1994 Pa. Super. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding flat sentence of one year imprisonment for criminal contempt of court illegal because court did not specify any minimum sentence
  • vacating a flat sentence of one year imprisonment for direct criminal contempt where no minimum sentence was imposed
  • amending flat sentence to include minimum term of incarceration equal to one-half maximum under circumstances where sentencing court clearly intended to impose maximum sentence
  • amending flat sentence to include minimum term of incarceration equal to one-half maximum under circumstances where sentencing court clearly intended to impose maximum sentence
  • stating, unless otherwise specified in the Sentencing Code, flat sentence of confinement or one that fails to set -8- J-S01032-15 minimum term violates Section 9756 of sentencing code
  • “Cain’s sentence is technically illegal because the court imposed a flat one year of imprisonment without specifying any minimum sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Olszewski, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.