Commonwealth v. Caetano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e consider the stun gun a per se dangerous weapon at common law.”
• “[W]e consider the stun gun a per se dangerous weapon at common law.”
• stun guns are not protected arms under the Second Amendment because they were not in common use at the enactment of the amendment and are considered per se dangerous at common law
• stun guns are not protected arms under the Second Amendment because they were not in common use at the enactment of the amendment and are considered per se dangerous at common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).