Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/11/1982
Commonwealth v. Cabeza
Citations
- 446 A.2d 958
- 300 Pa. Super. 483
- 1982 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fact of arrest cannot be used to prove criminal character because arrest is equally consistent with innocence as well as guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Beck, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-11-05· cited 117×
- Commonwealth v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-01· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-03-17· cited 32×
- Commonwealth v. LittleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-10-04· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. FawcettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-02· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. StewardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-07· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. GlascoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-16· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. HankersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.