Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Byrd

Citations

  • 472 A.2d 1141
  • 325 Pa. Super. 325
  • 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • due diligence and judicial delay established by notations in Quarter Sessions file moved into evidence by Commonwealth
  • Commonwealth is entitled to count resulting period of delay as excludable time under Rule 600 and a showing of due diligence is not required
  • “[a] court may properly take judicial notice of uncontested notations in the court record.”
  • notation E.P.D. in court file sufficient evidence that Commonwealth secured earliest available date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Cavanaugh, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.