Skip to main content
· 12/31/2020

Commonwealth v. Buxton, A., Pet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing this issue under section 685.101 and noting that the agreement at issue in that case satisfied all five jurisdictional requirements delineated in Jetbroadband
  • “[S]ections 685.101 and 685.102 allow parties to confer jurisdiction on the courts of Florida by contract alone if certain requirements are met.” (alteration added)
  • affirming an agreement’s provision applying Illinois law in Florida’s courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.