Commonwealth v. Buser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he question whether one crime merges into another crime for the purposes of imposing sentence must be answered by reference to the facts presented in the individual case”
• trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant’s sexual abuse of his daughter beginning when she was eight or nine years of age and continuing to age thirteen
• trial court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's sexual abuse of his daughter beginning when she was eight or nine years of age and continuing to age thirteen
• Evidence of appellant’s prior sexual abuse of his daughter starting when she was 8 or 9 to 13 years of age fit within the limited exception of Bell

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).