Commonwealth v. Burt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be logical to conclude that bank books, as well as other items, would be found in the defendants’ residences and vehicles
• person informing police of criminal activity was a municipal officer identified by name and address and did so in a face-to-face encounter with the police
• information not stale where affidavit described conspiracy to steal parking meter receipts over a five-month period
• in a case upholding a search pursuant to a warrant of a home that turned out to be a two-family , the court observed “(b
• Observations of defendants entering residences to be searched, and the fact that their vehicles were registered at the residences, provided probable cause to believe that the defendants resided at those premises
• probable cause to search car where defendants accused of larceny were observed moving packages between cars and residences, and where \hasty disposal of [contraband] could have been risky\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).