Skip to main content
· 12/27/1995

Commonwealth v. Burnsworth

Citations

  • 669 A.2d 883
  • 543 Pa. 18
  • 1995 Pa. LEXIS 1430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning
  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning
  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning
  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning
  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning
  • when language of statute is clear and unambiguous, it must be given effect in accordance with its plain and common meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro, Rule, Administration

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.