Commonwealth v. Burdge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant challenged admission of intoxilyzer results since machine used had not been approved prior to test; court held approval of machine prior to trial satisfies section § 1547(c)(1)
• court-established admission criteria in contravention of Supreme Court rules are invalid
• court-established admission criteria in contravention of Supreme Court rules are invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Williamson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-02· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. McGinnis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-09-25· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Feagley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-29· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Stranges
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-24· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Paul
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-09· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Ayers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-14· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Gano
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-07-07· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Mowry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-28· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Ayers
  Potter County Court of Common Pleas· 1986-06-19

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lutz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-06-26· cited 150×
• Commonwealth v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 60×