Commonwealth v. Bull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Tjhere must be more than the presumption that the evidence would be destroyed merely because it could be easily accomplished [...]. The fact that evidence may be destroyed [...] does not justify the suspension of the fourth amendment.” (emphasis in original
• forcible entry simultaneous with knock and announce, deemed illegal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).