Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/28/1955
Commonwealth v. Buford
Citations
- 179 Pa. Super. 312
- 116 A.2d 759
- 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that “the language in question [be] sufficient to inform appellant of the charge which he was called upon to answer and to protect him against a second conviction for the same offense,” 179 Pa.Super. at 315, 116 A.2d at 760
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rhodes, Hirt, Ross, Gunther, Wright, Ervin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-03-25· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-08-17· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-03-19· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. LaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-21· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-03-23· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. AshmorePhiladelphia County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1957-01-17
- Commonwealth v. WoolcuttMercer County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1962-12-31
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.