Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Buford

Citations

  • 179 Pa. Super. 312
  • 116 A.2d 759
  • 1955 Pa. Super. LEXIS 631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring that “the language in question [be] sufficient to inform appellant of the charge which he was called upon to answer and to protect him against a second conviction for the same offense,” 179 Pa.Super. at 315, 116 A.2d at 760

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rhodes, Hirt, Ross, Gunther, Wright, Ervin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.