Commonwealth v. Bruner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As to the necessity and purpose of the involuntary deviate sexual intercourse statute, the Commonwealth . . . does have a strong interest in . . . protecting minors from being sexually abused by adults.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. L.N.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-12· cited 56×
• Nelida Cabeda v. Attorney General United States
  Third Circuit· 2020-08-18· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Troy
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-13· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Parmelee
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2005-06-30· cited 1×
• Com. v. LN
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-12
• Commonwealth v. Bungarz
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1998-12-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Bonadio
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 101×
• Zimmerman v. O'BANNON
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-03-11· cited 82×
• Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers v. Commonwealth, Bureau of Employment Security Department of Labor & Industry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-06-30· cited 79×
• Commonwealth v. Maute
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-07· cited 61×
• Commonwealth v. Westcott
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-19· cited 52×