Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 886 A.2d 256
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 358
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3920

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding when Commonwealth “does specify, in the information . . ., the crime defendant intended to commit, the Commonwealth must prove the requisite intent for that particular crime in order to prove a burglary or attempted burglary.”
  • stating that “[w]hen the Commonwealth does specify, in the information or indictment, the crime defendant intended to commit, the Commonwealth must prove the requisite intent for that particular crime in order to prove a burglary or attempted burglary.”
  • “When the Commonwealth does specify, in the information or indictment, the crime defendant intended to commit, the Commonwealth must prove the requisite intent for that particular crime in order to prove a burglary or attempted burglary.”
  • “the Commonwealth is not required to specify what crime a defendant, who is charged with burglary (or attempted burglary), was intending to commit. Further, the Commonwealth need not prove the underlying crime to sustain a burglary conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lally-Green, Panella, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.