Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brown

Citations

  • 620 A.2d 1213
  • 423 Pa. Super. 264
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a bicycle “clearly f[e]ll[] within the confines of [the] definition” set forth in Section 102 of the Motor Vehicle Code
  • reversing dismissal of DUI charges against bicycle rider because a bicycle is a vehicle under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 102, and refusing to consult legislative history to define “vehicle” because there is no ambiguity in the statutory definition
  • “[a] bicycle is clearly not a motor vehicle as it is a vehicle “which is propelled solely by human power.’ ”
  • bicycle is a “vehicle” under 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3731, which proscribes persons from driving vehicles while under the influence of alcohol which renders him incapable of safe driving

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, Sole, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.