Commonwealth v. Braykovich

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant’s notice of appeal was timely, as it was filed within 30 days of an untimely order denying the appellant’s post-sentence motion
• holding that the appellant’s notice of appeal was timely, as it was filed within 30 days of an untimely order denying the appellant’s post-sentence motion
• holding that appellant’s notice of appeal was timely, as it was filed within 30 days of an untimely order denying post-sentence motions
• holding that appeal was proper where appellant’s failure involved a breakdown in the court system
• concluding that delay by a clerk of courts constitutes a “breakdown in the court system” and therefore excuses appellants’ untimely notices of appeal
• holding that court may consider untimely-filed notice of appeal when clerk of courts interfered and caused a breakdown in the processes of the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).