Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Brant

Citations

  • 414 A.2d 707
  • 272 Pa. Super. 135
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Jjudicial surmise as to the reason for the Commonwealth’s failure to bring appellant to trial cannot serve as a substitute for the Commonwealth’s affirmative duty to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it has met the requirements of Rule 1100(c).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Hester and Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.