Commonwealth v. Boyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• parole reports are directly admissible pursuant to the “catch-all” phrase set out in G. L. c. 123A, § 14[c]
• “While [G. L. c. 123A, § 14 (c),] trumps a hearsay objection to the admission of the report, still remaining is the issue of hearsay within the report. Traditional rules of evidence apply”
• totem pole hearsay is hearsay within hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McHoul
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-08· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Edward
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2009-09-02· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Cruz
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-12-02· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Zorn
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-05-03· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Given
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-09-24· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Morales
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-04-01· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Department of Youth Services v. a Juvenile
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-11-04· cited 117×
• Commonwealth v. Boucher
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-12-17· cited 69×
• Commonwealth v. Markvart
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-07-18· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-11-10· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. McDonough
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-08-12· cited 45×
• Commonwealth v. Bladsa
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-10-27· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Thurston
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-01-10· cited 26×
• Thompson
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1977-05-05· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Tucker
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-01-14· cited 1×