Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Boyer

Citations

  • 891 A.2d 1265
  • 586 Pa. 142
  • 2006 Pa. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming aggregate sentence of 26 to 100 years of imprisonment for ten robbery and related convictions where court oonsidered presentence report and the particular circumstances of the crimes
  • substantial claim raised where \the trial court imposed a manifestly excessive sentence and focused solely on the serious nature of the crimes he committed\
  • substantial claim raised where “the trial court imposed a manifestly excessive sentence and focused solely on the serious nature of the crimes he committed”
  • substantial claim raised where the trial court imposed a manifestly excessive sentence and focused solely on the serious nature of the crimes [defendant] committed
  • focusing on nature of crime in sentencing raises substantial question
  • “[W]here the sentencing judge had the benefit of a presentence investigation report, it will be presumed that he or she was aware of the relevant information regarding the defendant's character and weighed those considerations along with mitigating statutory factors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Cappy, Former, Nigro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.