Commonwealth v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where appellant drove in erratic manner and smelled of alcohol, BAC reading of .16% thirty minutes after arrest sufficient to permit finding that appellant violated § 3731(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kubik
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-06-15· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Duda
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-31· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Zelinski
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-04-18· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Murray
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-21· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-05-15· cited 13×
• Haas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-27· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Garofalo
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-08-03· cited 8×
• Commonwealth v. Maly
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-05-03· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Mikulan
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 166×
• Commonwealth v. Stoyko
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-17· cited 132×
• Commonwealth v. DiFrancesco
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-10-16· cited 92×
• Commonwealth v. Speights
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-04-03· cited 54×
• Commonwealth v. Slingerland
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-09· cited 41×
• Commonwealth v. Rivera
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-20· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Gearhart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 22×