Commonwealth v. Boxley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a trial court has discretion to (Footnote Continued Next Page
• stating a challenge to the inconsistency of evidence is a proper question of weight not sufficiency
• “During individual voir dire[,] a capital defendant is also permitted to ask life[-]qualifying questions.”
• evidence was sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for first-degree murder, regardless of whether appellant or one of his co-conspirators fired the fatal shot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).