Commonwealth v. Bowersox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an allegation that the judge failed to consider sentencing factors does not raise a substantial sentencing question
• concluding the belief that false testimony cannot be the sole reason for imposing an aggravated sentence
• claim that court failed to consider that defendant had no criminal record, a job offer at the time of sentencing and a 9-year-old daughter did not present substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Zirkle
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-18· cited 491×
• Commonwealth v. Hennel
  Delaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-05-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-10· cited 739×
• United States v. Grayson
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 708×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-19· cited 95×
• Commonwealth v. Mobley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-31· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Nelson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-19· cited 36×
• Commonwealth v. Osteen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-01-11· cited 35×
• Commonwealth v. Thurmond
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-27· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Alicea
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-09-13· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Groft
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-14· cited 12×