Commonwealth v. Bower

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the timeliness of an appeal goes to the subj ect-matter jurisdiction of the court and may therefore be raised at any time, even on the appellate level, either by the parties or by the court on its own motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-03-29· cited 139×
• Turner v. May Corp.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-03-13· cited 66×
• Baker v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-06-29· cited 16×
• In re Mausoleum Construction Co.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-12-22· cited 14×
• Windrick v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-23· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Gross
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-18· cited 5×
• Commonwealth v. Grassi
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-11-09· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Bixby
  Chester County Court of Common Pleas· 1987-09-08
• PennDOT v. Dyer
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-02-01

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Little
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-01-24· cited 146×
• Commonwealth v. Ehret
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-09-19· cited 7×