Massachusetts Appeals Court· 4/2/2004
Commonwealth v. Blair
Citations
- 60 Mass. App. Ct. 741
- 805 N.E.2d 1011
- 2004 Mass. App. LEXIS 356
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissal is proper disposition where party lost right to declaratory relief for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Blair v. Department of Conservation & RecreationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-08-26· cited 10×
- Vranos v. SkinnerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2010-07-19· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. GuzmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-03-29· cited 7×
- Collins v. Historic District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2008-12-19· cited 1×
- Oprzedek v. City of BeverlyMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-03-12
- Blair v. Massachusetts Department of Conservation & RecreationMassachusetts Superior Court· 2006-10-31
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Grubhub Holdings Inc. and Grubhub Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2023-04-21
- Fbt Everett Realty, LLC v. Massachusetts Gaming Commission v. Wynn Ma, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court· 2024-12-26
- Rff Family Partnership Lp and Saugus Developer LLC v. Shops at Saugus LLC and Town of SaugusMassachusetts Superior Court· 2025-02-05
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 2,607×
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,333×
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 1,400×
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,272×
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,040×
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 859×
- MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo CountySupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 565×
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 562×
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court· 1997-05-27· cited 426×
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 244×
- Howard H. Gilbert, Jr. v. City of CambridgeFirst Circuit· 1991-05-03· cited 181×
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-21· cited 77×
- FIC Homes of Blackstone, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-11-21· cited 60×
- Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1968-02-16· cited 55×
- Steinbergh v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-12-10· cited 34×
- Goldman v. Planning Board of BurlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1964-04-14· cited 31×
- Lopes v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-03-14· cited 29×
- Wilson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-08-11· cited 22×
- Slack v. Inspector of Buildings of WellesleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-02-28· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.