Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/4/1985
Commonwealth v. Bivens
Citations
- 337 Pa. Super. 216
- 486 A.2d 984
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he depositing of a letter in the post office, postage prepaid, properly addressed to a person at his place of business or residence, is prima facie evidence that it was received in the ordinary course of mails”
- “The depositing of a letter in the post office, postage prepaid, properly addressed to a person at his place of business or residence, is prima facie evidence that it was received in the ordinary course of mails.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosky, Olszewski, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.