Commonwealth v. Bezio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state rule of evidentiary privilege “of course . .. does not bar the use of ... evidence in the trial of a federal cause of action”
• substantial effect alleged by clinic buying $4,000 worth of out-of-state supplies and performing services costing $12,000 on out-of-state patients
• district court held that interstate flow of revenues did not vest federal court with jurisdiction; court of appeals did not reach issue
• clinic asserted tortious interference with contractual relations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).