Commonwealth v. Bernal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Lyons and 75 Pa.C.S. § 6502(c) to conclude that an offense expressly classified as a summary offense remains so “notwithstanding the penalty enhancement” for repeat offenders
• a section 6502(a) offense remains a summary offense, notwithstanding the penalty enhancement
• a section 6502(a) offense remains a summary offense, notwithstanding the penalty enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Soboleski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-17· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Ede
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-28· cited 9×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Lyons
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-03· cited 12×
• Commonwealth v. Sperry
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-02· cited 8×