Skip to main content
· 5/1/1986

Commonwealth v. Bennie

Citations

  • 508 A.2d 1211
  • 352 Pa. Super. 558
  • 1986 Pa. Super. LEXIS 10527

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to be entitled to a separate trial a defendant must establish that his defense and those of his co-defendants are irreconcilable, exclusive and conflicting in the case
  • to require severance, the defenses presented must be “irreconcilable and exclusive” and “conflict at the core”
  • subsequent identification is admissible where clear and convincing evidence indicates that it was based upon source independent of tainted identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Olszewski, Tamilia, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.