Skip to main content
· 11/20/2014

Commonwealth v. Belknap

Citations

  • 105 A.3d 7
  • 2014 Pa. Super. 259
  • 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4526
  • 2014 WL 6482782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he following two requirements must be satisfied in order for a statement to qualify as a medical treatment exception: (1) the statement must be made for the purpose of receiving medical treatment; and (2) the statement must be necessary and proper for diagnosis and treatment.”
  • applying the exception to allow a police officer to testify as to hearsay statements that were made by friends of an unconscious drug overdose victim to the officer while he was attempting to resuscitate the victim
  • alterations in original and citations, some brackets, and quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donohue, Mundy, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.