· 11/20/2014
Commonwealth v. Belknap
Citations
- 105 A.3d 7
- 2014 Pa. Super. 259
- 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4526
- 2014 WL 6482782
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he following two requirements must be satisfied in order for a statement to qualify as a medical treatment exception: (1) the statement must be made for the purpose of receiving medical treatment; and (2) the statement must be necessary and proper for diagnosis and treatment.”
- applying the exception to allow a police officer to testify as to hearsay statements that were made by friends of an unconscious drug overdose victim to the officer while he was attempting to resuscitate the victim
- alterations in original and citations, some brackets, and quotation marks omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donohue, Mundy, Stabile
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.