Commonwealth v. Beatty
Citations
- 15 Pa. Super. 5
- 1900 Pa. Super. LEXIS 290
Syllabus
<p>Criminal law — Sufficiency of indictment — Employee’s act of 1897.</p> <p>An indictment under the Act of April 29, 1897, P. L. 30, “ to regulate the employment and provide for the health and safety of men, women and children in manufacturing establishments,” etc., is sufficient in form when the offense charged is set out in the exact words of the act of assembly of 1860, which requires only substantial conformity with the act prohibiting the offense and prescribing the punishment.</p> <p>Constitutional law — Sufficiency of title — Employee's act o/1897.</p> <p>The title of the Act of April 29, 1897, P. L. 30, fairly invites an examination of the contents of the bill by all who employ men, women and children in industrial establishments mentioned, and everything which the nature of the subject of a title reasonably suggests as necessary or appropriate for the accomplishment of the expressed purpose is sufficiently indicated by the title.</p> <p>Constitutional law — Act of 1897 — Police power — Regulation of hours of labor.</p> <p>The employer’s act of 1897, sees. 1 and 14, is not in violation of article- 1, section 1, as unjustly interfering with an adult female’s right of acquiring and possessing property, nor of article 3, section 7, in that it is a special law regulating labor.</p> <p>The act is a proper exercise of the inherent police power of government, vested in the legislation, to make such laws as they shall judge to be for the good of the commonwealth.</p> <p>The length of time a laborer shall be subjected to the exhaustive exertion of physical labor is as clearly within legislative control as is the governmental inspection of boilers, etc., to avoid accidents, or of the sanitary conditions of factories and the like to preserve the health of laborers.</p> <p>In the exercise of its police power the state may enact laws in the interest of public morals, and to protect the lives, health and safety of persons following specified callings, and may thus indire
Judges: Beaver, Mitchell, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-06-09· cited 366×
- Jewell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-02-19· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. MintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-02-14· cited 17×
- Withey v. BloemMichigan Supreme Court· 1910-12-07· cited 16×
- Court of Industrial Relations v. Charles Wolff Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1921-10-08· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. PapsoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-10-10· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. MeadsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-11-20· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. KenneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1907-02-25· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. BerrymanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-07-17· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. BauderLehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1958-06-24· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. ClymerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-01-13· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. McCombSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-05-10· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. HazenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-07-10· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. CaseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-07-20· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. WormserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-07-13· cited 1×
- Burns v. PaulakPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1948-03-08
- Commonwealth v. FeltonDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1922-03-01
- Commonwealth v. Studebaker Touring CarMontgomery County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1923-10-25
- Commonwealth v. HeltDauphin County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1936-03-02
- City of New Castle v. SullivanLawrence County Court of Quarter Sessions· 1939-07-03
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 909×
- Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1878-05-13· cited 406×
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1888-04-09· cited 387×
- Ritchie v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-03-14· cited 132×
- Powell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1887-01-03· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-04-12· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. Hamilton Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-05-06· cited 36×
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1895-07-01· cited 32×
- Chunk v. McGeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1876-05-08· cited 21×
- State v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court· 1896-10-29· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-10-10· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.