Commonwealth v. Basile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “no contact” provisions of protective order must be interpreted “broadly; there are many ways to achieve a communication”
• no contact provision violated when defendant is seen by protected individual more than one block away from her, jumping up and down and waving at her
• “Our cases generally interpret ‘contact’ broadly; there are many ways to achieve a communication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Serra
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2015-09-24· cited 343×
• Iamele v. Asselin
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-22· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Kendrick
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-02-09· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Mendonca
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-01-08· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Leger
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-08-08· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Consoli
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2003-08-05· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Medeiros
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2019-04-04· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Kendrick
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2005-03-11· cited 1×
• Commonwealth v. Slayman
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-01-05
• Commonwealth v. Woolf
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-04-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Latimore
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-08-07· cited 1,893×
• Commonwealth v. Delaney
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-28· cited 102×
• Commonwealth v. Tate
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-05-05· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Butler
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-02-22· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. Russell
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-02-10· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Crimmins
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-03-19· cited 15×